{"id":148341,"date":"2024-01-08T21:31:44","date_gmt":"2024-01-08T21:31:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.techopedia.com"},"modified":"2024-01-08T21:37:29","modified_gmt":"2024-01-08T21:37:29","slug":"openai-comes-out-fighting-for-looser-regulations-amidst-nyt-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.techopedia.com\/openai-comes-out-fighting-for-looser-regulations-amidst-nyt-lawsuit","title":{"rendered":"OpenAI Comes Out Fighting for Looser Regulations Amidst NYT Lawsuit\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

OpenAI has submitted a written statement to the UK’s House of Lords claiming it would be “impossible” to create services like ChatGPT<\/a> without using copyrighted material.<\/p>\n

“Because copyright today covers virtually every sort of human expression – including blog posts, photographs, forum posts, scraps of software code, and government documents – it would be impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials,” said OpenAI in its evidence<\/a> (PDF) submitted to the House of Lords communications and digital select committee.<\/p>\n

As The Telegraph<\/a> reports, the submission marks an attempt to lobby for a revision of copyright law in the UK. It comes just after\u00a0 The New York Times<\/a> announced it was suing OpenAI<\/a> and Microsoft for billions, alleging that the organizations scraped millions of articles from its website to train ChatGPT, which it also said would generate “verbatim” excerpts from the articles.<\/p>\n

A Brief Look at OpenAI’s Argument for Fair Use<\/span><\/h2>\n

OpenAI’s evidence admits that ChatGPT is trained on data publicly available on the internet, which includes copyrighted material, but asserts that “we believe that legally copyright law does not forbid training.”<\/p>\n

In a blog post<\/a> released today, January 8th, OpenAI clarified this stance further, arguing that training AI models on publicly available training data is fair use<\/a>\u00a0and provides a list of academics, companies, and other groups who’ve recently submitted comments to the US copyright office.<\/p>\n

READ MORE:<\/strong><\/p>\n