{"id":148341,"date":"2024-01-08T21:31:44","date_gmt":"2024-01-08T21:31:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.techopedia.com"},"modified":"2024-01-08T21:37:29","modified_gmt":"2024-01-08T21:37:29","slug":"openai-comes-out-fighting-for-looser-regulations-amidst-nyt-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.techopedia.com\/openai-comes-out-fighting-for-looser-regulations-amidst-nyt-lawsuit","title":{"rendered":"OpenAI Comes Out Fighting for Looser Regulations Amidst NYT Lawsuit\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"
OpenAI has submitted a written statement to the UK’s House of Lords claiming it would be “impossible” to create services like ChatGPT<\/a> without using copyrighted material.<\/p>\n “Because copyright today covers virtually every sort of human expression – including blog posts, photographs, forum posts, scraps of software code, and government documents – it would be impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials,” said OpenAI in its evidence<\/a> (PDF) submitted to the House of Lords communications and digital select committee.<\/p>\n As The Telegraph<\/a> reports, the submission marks an attempt to lobby for a revision of copyright law in the UK. It comes just after\u00a0 The New York Times<\/a> announced it was suing OpenAI<\/a> and Microsoft for billions, alleging that the organizations scraped millions of articles from its website to train ChatGPT, which it also said would generate “verbatim” excerpts from the articles.<\/p>\n OpenAI’s evidence admits that ChatGPT is trained on data publicly available on the internet, which includes copyrighted material, but asserts that “we believe that legally copyright law does not forbid training.”<\/p>\n In a blog post<\/a> released today, January 8th, OpenAI clarified this stance further, arguing that training AI models on publicly available training data is fair use<\/a>\u00a0and provides a list of academics, companies, and other groups who’ve recently submitted comments to the US copyright office.<\/p>\n READ MORE:<\/strong><\/p>\n Co-founder of Coursera and ex-head of Baidu AI Group, Google Brain, Andrew Ng, also recently released a post on X stating that he “would like to see training on the public internet covered under fair use.”<\/p>\n “I understand why media companies don’t like people training on their documents, but believe that just as humans are allowed to read documents on the open internet, learn from them, and synthesize brand new ideas, AI should be allowed to do so too,” Ng said.<\/p>\n After reading the @nytimes<\/a> lawsuit against @OpenAI<\/a> and @Microsoft<\/a>, I find my sympathies more with OpenAI and Microsoft than with the NYT. <\/p>\n The suit: — Andrew Ng (@AndrewYNg) January 7, 2024<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\nA Brief Look at OpenAI’s Argument for Fair Use<\/span><\/h2>\n
\n
\n
(1) Claims, among other things, that OpenAI and Microsoft used millions of copyrighted NYT articles to train their models
(2)\u2026<\/p>\n